Supreme Court's Observation on stray dog menace: 'Those who feed them could be held responsible...'

They will be responsible for vaccination and bear cost if attacked!

On Friday, The Supreme Court suggested people who routinely feed stray dogs could be made responsible for their vaccination and also liable to bear the costs if those animals attack people, while emphasising on a need to find a solution to the stray dogs` menace.

Dog attacks have been reported frequently these days. The cases of dog attack or bite have been reported day after day. 

Not only street dogs, other pet dogs have been a part of this incident. 

As a bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and JK Maheshwari was hearing petitions in connection with the stray dogs` menace in Kerala, Justice Khanna orally observed that he is a dog lover and there are many dog lovers and suggested that people who feed stray dogs could possibly keep a number or marking on the dog they feed.

"They will be responsible for vaccinating them and bearing the cost if a person is attacked," he said.

The bench emphasised that it is essential to find the solution of stray dogs` menace and need to create a balance between people who feed stray dogs and also protect innocent people from being attacked by stray dogs.

It observed that it is important to accept there is a problem - dogs may become ferocious due to lack of food or they may get an infection. It further added that rabies infected dogs could be put in a care centre by authorities concerned.

The court also asked the Sri Jagan Commission, formed by the Supreme Court in 2016 to inquire into complaints about dog attacks and distribution of compensation to victims in Kerala, to submit a report.

After hearing arguments, the top court scheduled the matter for further hearing on September 28, and permitted animal rights groups to intervene.